After more than two decades of disproportionately harsh federal crack cocaine sentences, it seems the political stars finally may be aligned to correct this glaring disparity in the nation's sentencing laws. We hope Congress will move expeditiously on the matter.
Last week, a senior Justice Department official urged lawmakers to reduce mandatory minimum sentences for sale and and possession of crack cocaine to mirror those for powder cocaine.
Back in the 1980s, when crack cocaine was a scary new drug, concerned lawmakers passed harsh mandatory minimum penalties for crack.
The sentences were far more stringent than those for powder cocaine, which is the same drug in a different form.
The disparity has come to be known as the "100-to-1" ratio. Possession of five grams of crack mandates a five-year prison sentence, but it takes possession of 100 times as much powder cocaine to get the same sentence.
6 comments:
White people need crystal meth laws.
I agree. And if they are implemented you won't see white people complaining about too many "young white men" being imprisioned. We throw out our trash, you people don't.
HAM alert! I see from the above comment that the HAM is in full effect.
You about as bad as the man. Can you refute his argument with anything other then a ridiculous ham alert?
Still waitin o caller of HAM.
crickets
Post a Comment